Privy Council Wellington
3, 4, 5 May; 27 June 1994
Lord Keith of Kinkel, Lord Goff of Chieveley, Lord Browne-Wilkinson, Lord Mustill, Lord Nolan
3, 4, 5 May; 27 June 1994
Lord Keith of Kinkel, Lord Goff of Chieveley, Lord Browne-Wilkinson, Lord Mustill, Lord Nolan
Defamation — Defences — Parliamentary privilege — Defendant pleading truth, fair comment, qualified privilege on ground of reciprocal duty and interest, and mitigation of damages — Defendant relying, inter alia, on statements in House of Representatives — Whether Courts can inquire into these allegations in the absence of waiver by the House of Representatives itself and other members affected — Whether proceedings should be stayed until privilege waived — Bill of Rights 1688, art 9 - New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 14.
Defamation — Defences — Stay of proceedings — Whether proceedings should be stayed where parliamentary privilege arises from defences alleged and privilege not waived by House of Representatives — Bill of Rights 1688, art 9 - New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, s 14.
Loading... Please wait...
